Last night I was at a Sydney underground venue, which shall remain nameless here. I played in a larger (8-piece) modern jazz ensemble: some well written original music by Glenn Doig featuring wonderful jazz players from the younger side of the Sydney scene. Before our performance, there was a terrific solo set by Carl Dewhurst. The audience was small by commercial standards – maybe 30 people – but on the large side for this particular venue (I’ve certainly played there before to much fewer people). This venue sells no consumables, and audiences pay a set fee which is distributed to the performers. The venue operators choose to run their space ‘underground’ for a number of reasons; not the least of which is that planning legislation and real estate prices in NSW combine into a extremely prohibitive atmosphere for venues. The traditional model in this environment, and the one that the NSW government seems to favour, is to run performances as an aside to some other core business: food and drink generally, the logic being that booze and dinner – or coffee and cake – will pay for itself and the overheads generated by licensing and building regulations. The principal problem with this as I see it is that these enterprises are not necessarily scale-able. The is a fairly high entry point, in terms of costs and viable turnover.

Last week we learned that QIRKZ, an amazing venue I have tweeted about before, was unequivocally shut down by Marrickville Council. QIRKZ had been operating under the square’s radar for some time, and politically minded people will no doubt argue that regardless of the value, making any statement by carrying on an illegal activity is the wrong way to do things. However, QIRKZ was able to present music in a manner that no legit venue in this city can provide. Although unsubsidised by alcohol or food sales, QIRKZ and other underground venues have the ability to take risks in programming that venues with higher overheads and much more at stake can not afford to take. Also, without out commercial overheads and profit motive, they can allow flexibility in terms of performance format, hours and a place where minors can happily enjoy live music performance. Plus it had vibe. The irony is that many bands who do pull reasonably large audiences still gravitate towards these venues because the absence of commercial motives changes the atmosphere, dramatically.

If the above conflicts are a mystery to you it goes something like this: in this example the building QIRKZ occupies is designated a small factory: to legitimately alter that classification in any way with the local governing council requires a lengthy and expensive process called a Development Application. In addition, ostensibly for safety reasons, a legitimate performance venue faces much more restrictive (and therefore expensive) building regulations in regards to the number, size and manner of safety features such as fire exits. All common sense, you say, until you learn that one property apparently fit for 50-100 employees is not fit for 50-100 audience members. Or that a fire exit in a property is suitable for cafe, but it requires renovations costing $10k to move said exit one inch to operate as a venue. Possible hyperbole aside, you get the idea. From memory the estimated costs of required alterations to the QIRKZ venue ran well into the tens of thousands of dollars.

Recently another notorious and beloved underground venue, 505, was ‘legitimised’, a process that involved moving the brand and operation to a new premises that was already covered by the appropriate regulations and sanctioned by the Sydney Council (which had long been aware of the venue but chose a constructive avenue to deal with it). In a sense, this was a big win for the scene, and for the operators Cameron Undy and his partner Kerrie, who in various projects have done much for music in Sydney. But the fact remains that Cam and Kerrie now face higher overheads, probably less freedom in their curatorship, and that minors as an audience present a potentially sticky problem, as the new 505 is licensed to sell alcohol.

Individual venues and operators aside, the issues here are important to audiences and performers:

1) Outside these illegitimate venues, there is a dearth of options for under-18s who wish to attend something related to the current improvised or jazz scene in Sydney. SIMA at the Seymour Centre is an option, and I promote it to my students as often as possible, but it’s a little too expensive, too late and probably just a little too square for the kids. Options for people who find club or bar environments abhorrent (something the government presumably considers un-Australian) are similarly few and far between.

2) there are niche-genres within all kinds of music that involve small but devoted audiences. These niches are active, valuable, and feed musicians and musical innovations to more mainstream genres, but they are not financially viable where venue-hire, commercial overheads or pretty much any other cost is applied. I feel it’s important that someone can hold an solo improv set somewhere for ten people. Or that an artist who gets 80 people through the door can actually pay their band, rather than see the door takings swallowed whole by the clubs overheads (a recent experience of mine).

There is a real habit in NSW of further marginalising any performance genre or artist who is not immediately appealing to 200 or more ticket-buyers. Because under that roughly that number no-one gets paid, the band goes home and the venue considers it a dud night (except possibly for the Macquarie Hotel, who seem to do wonders with their danceable line-up of soul and funk bands). And yes plenty of musicians will do it for the love, so to speak, but that’s not necessarily sustainable. Why shouldn’t a small audience base be sustainable and financially viable for all concerned? A popular culture fairytale of a brief period underground, before emerging triumphant with ARIAs, a lengthy and well-attended national tour and healthy online single sales shouldn’t be the only version of success and this world is choc-full of musicians who have succeeded in making a valuable statement and a measurable impact, but who don’t have viable audiences by commercial standards.